Inductive and Deductive Reasoning in Sports and Exercise Coaching Process: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2023.2.03Keywords:
deductive and inductive teachingAbstract
Background. Skill acquisition in teaching a new physical exercise skill is quite similar in process to other skill-learning in general. In teaching physical exercise techniques, two teaching and learning approaches can be used. Most often instructors used the deductive method in teaching exercise techniques. But in a real-life setup, it is quite common to hear athletes learn exercise techniques on their own self, with limited guidance or exposure to proper steps or techniques (inductively).
The aim of the study. This study aimed at identifying the actual number of studies that have been conducted and/or compared the usage of deductive and inductive teaching approaches in teaching exercises or sports skills.
Materials and methods. This systematic review used PRISMA guidelines to locate related literature. Eligible papers were evaluated for integrity, and relevant findings were combined to enable thematic analysis.
Results. Twenty-six studies have actually fulfilled the requirements standards and were selected for review and analysis. In total, 1430 participants participated in those selected studies. Except for four studies, other studies have been found to have a low risk of bias, which indicated the research to be more accurate. This review showed that most of the instructors (teachers, coaches) prefer to use the inductive method. Five studies used the inductive method and three studies used the deductive method directly. The other 18 studies used the deductive and inductive methods indirectly or combined with other approaches. The inductive approach method was more effective according to the results.
Conclusion. The inductive method for teaching exercise skills is said to be more preferred mainly due to a good response received from the students in the majority of the studies, and considered more effective for teaching a new exercise or sports skills. The deductive method has not been totally sidelined but it is less preferred.
Downloads
References
Wahl-Alexander, Z., & Curtner-Smith, M. D. (2019). Influence of negotiations on preservice teachers’ instruction within the skill themes approach unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39(4), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0332
Atjonen, P., Pöntinen, S., Kontkanen, S., & Ruotsalainen, P. (2022). In Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Focus on Knowledge Base, Conceptions of Assessment, and Teacher Learning. Frontiers in Education, 7, 891391. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.891391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.891391
Bravo, R. E. S., & Gámez, M. R. (2021). Information and communication technologies, their impact on the teaching-learning process. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 9(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n1.1981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n1.1981
Derakhshi, S. A., Rezaii, L., Razavi, F., & Sarfaraz, F. (2016). Identification of Relationship between the Use of Mobile-based Virtual Social Networks and Critical Thinking Skills. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1 S1), 259. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n1s1p259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n1s1p259
Dinuta, N. (2013). Didactic strategies used in teaching–learninig of premathematical operations in preschool education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.116
Frederiksen, H., Cooner, D., & Stevenson, C. (2012). Assessing teacher dispositions in pre-service teachers. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 9(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v9i1.6714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v9i1.6714
Gaona, C., Castro, S., & Palikara, O. (2020). The views and aspirations of young people with autism spectrum disorders and their provision in the new Education Health and Care plans in England. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(23), 3383-3394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1593520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1593520
González-Calvo, G., & Fernández-Balboa, J. M. (2018). A qualitative analysis of the factors determining the quality of relations between a novice physical education teacher and his students’ families: implications for the development of professional identity. Sport, Education and Society, 23(5), 491- 504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1208164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1208164
Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., ... & Sterne, J. A. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj, 343. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
Hilland, T., Ridgers, N., Stratton, G., Knowles, Z., & Fairclough, S. (2018). Origins of perceived physical education ability and worth among English adolescents. European Physical Education Review, 24(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x16673765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X16673765
Hordvik, M., MacPhail, A., & Ronglan, L. T. (2019). Learning to teach sport education: investigating a pre- service teacher’s knowledge development. Sport, education and society, 24(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1322948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1322948
Kranzfelder, P., Bankers-Fulbright, J. L., García-Ojeda, M. E., Melloy, M., Mohammed, S., & Warfa, A. R. M. (2019). The Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP): A quantitative method for characterizing teacher discourse moves in undergraduate STEM learning environments. PloS one, 14(7), e0219019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219019
Sanchez, X., Torregrossa, M., Woodman, T., Jones, G., & Llewellyn, D. J. (2019). Identification of parameters that predict sport climbing performance. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01294
Mohamad, N. I., Alali, A. A., Malek, N. F. A., & Nadzalan, A. M. (2021). Relationship between Squat Mobility with Snatch and Clean & Jerk Technique. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1874(1), 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012017
Li, X., Cox, A., & Ford, N. (2017). Knowledge construction by users: A content analysis framework and a knowledge construction process model for virtual product user communities. Journal of Documentation, 73(2), 284-304. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2016-0060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2016-0060
Wahl-Alexander, Z., & Curtner-Smith, M. D. (2019). Influence of negotiations on preservice teachers’ instruction within the skill themes approach unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39(4), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0332
Oliveira, A. W., & Brown, A. O. (2016). Exemplification in science instruction: Teaching and learning through examples. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 737-767. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21319
Pérez-Sánchez, M., Galstyan-Sargsyan, R., Pérez-Sánchez, M. I., & López-Jiménez, P. A. (2018). Experimental equipment to develop teaching of the concept viscosity. Education Sciences, 8(4), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040179
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Alhussin Alali, Azzam Ahmad Alhossin Alali, Mohd Hafizuddin Baki, Nor Ikhmar Madarsa, Nur Ikhwan Mohamad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
