Automated Control and Delivery System for Science Practical Instructions to Public Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2024.5.2.04Keywords:
automation, artificial intelligence, science teachers, practical instructions, readiness and delivery systemAbstract
Background. The dispatch of practical instructions to schools and supervisors before the actual conduct of the practical examination over the years has not received the same level of attention as given to the movements of people and goods and, therefore, is prone to challenges. However, the process could be automated using artificial intelligence. Previous studies have investigated the effects of automation on the control and delivery of goods in the transport management sector.
Objectives. This study assessed science teachers’ challenges and readiness for automated practical instruction control and delivery systems.
Materials and methods. The study adopted an ex post facto design and recruited one hundred science teachers. Science Teacher Readiness for Automated Practical Instruction Control and Delivery (r = 0.83) was used to collect data, which were analysed descriptively.
Results. There are more male (73%) science teachers than female (27%). 84% of the respondents listed cost as one of the challenges, and 83% indicated resistance to change and technical difficulties, ethical issues (67%), and integration with the existing system (65%). The science teachers are moderately ready (64%). In comparison, 24% are lowly ready, and 12% are highly prepared to deploy an automated practical instruction control and delivery system.
Conclusion. Automation for delivering practical science instructions has more significant benefits than the manual method; however, science teachers are ready for its deployment despite its challenges. Therefore, efforts should be geared towards overcoming the inherent difficulties so that the benefits can be thoroughly enjoyed.
Downloads
References
Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., Croker, S., & Hartig, H. (2016). What students learn from hands-on activities? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21320
Fadzil, H.M., & Saat, R.M. (2013). Phenomenographic study of students’ manipulative skills during transition from primary to secondary school. Sains Humanika, 63(2), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.2013
Okam, C. C., & Zakari, I. I. (2017). Impact of Laboratory-Based Teaching Strategy on Students’ Attitudes and Mastery of Chemistry in Katsina Metropolis, Katsina State, Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 6(1), 112.
Hinneh, J.T. (2017). Attitude towards Practical Work and Students’ Achievement in Biology: A Case of a Private Senior Secondary School in Gaborone, Botswana. IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM), 13(4), 06-11.
Sotiriou, S., Bybee, R.W., & Bogner, F.X. (2017). PATHWAYS–A Case of Large-Scale Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Scientific Inquiry-Based Science Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p8
Ajeyalemi, D. (2011). Practical work in school science: are the aims objectives being achieved? Memorial lecture in 52nd Annual Conference of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, pp 3-15.
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
Ubulom, W. J. & Wokocha, K. (2017). Readiness and Acceptability of # Computer-Based Test (CBT) for Post-University Matriculation Examinations (PUME) among Urban and Rural Senior Secondary School Students in Rivers State. International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 5(3), 51-60.
Jinadu, A. T., Oyaremi, M. K. & Rufai, M. D. (2021). Assessment of the Oyo state teaching service commission interactive learning platforms during covid_19 lockdown period in Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 3(1) 37-44. http://doi.org/10.51986/ijer-2021.vol3.01.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51986/ijer-2021.vol3.01.04
Naqvi, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence for audit, forensic accounting, and valuation: A strategic perspective. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111960 1906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119601906
Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824-2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861
Cukurova, M., & Luckin, R. (2018). Measuring the impact of emerging technologies in education: A pragmatic approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_81-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71054-9_81
Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre-and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.chb.2020.106552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552
Jinadu, A. T., & Balogun, R. T. (2020). Availability and Adoption of Online Learning Platforms during Covid-19 Lockdown in Nigeria. Diverse Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(5), 8-12.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign. org/wp-content/uploads/AIED-Book-Excerpt-CCR.pdf
Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824-2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Afeez Jinadu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
